Hong Kong Democratic Party stirs up universal suffrage reform package controversy

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to: navigation, search

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

China
Related articles
  • 16 March 2015: Xu Caihou, former Chinese general, dies aged 71
  • 7 February 2015: Chinese market fire kills seventeen, child detained
  • 17 October 2014: Hong Kong police move to open roads in Mong Kok
  • 2 October 2014: Hong Kong democracy protesters call for CY Leung resignation as demonstrations continue
  • 23 September 2014: Tropical storm Fung-wong makes landfall in Eastern China
Location of China
CHN orthographic.svg
Collaborate!
  • Pillars of Wikinews writing
  • Writing an article

The Democratic Party has been stirring up some controversy by proposing a revision of the 2012 constitutional package regarding the universal suffrage in Hong Kong, which the local government as well as the National People’s Congress, accepted. The Legislative Council (LegCo) lawmakers are scheduled to cast their ballots tomorrow to decide whether or not the proposal will be accepted, and it is highly likely that the proposal will be approved.

Yesterday night, the Democratic Party held a long meeting to debate on the controversial issue. After five hours, consensus aroused in the Party to accept the package, with only 63 opposed to the LegCo part of the proposal and 71 to the Chief Executive part, as compared to 246 and 237 in support of the LegCo and Chief Executive parts respectively. “The decision is not just a historical one for the Democratic Party, but also a milestone for the city’s progress in democracy,” said the Party chairman Albert Ho.

Under the new revision, ten constituencies would be added to the original 60 of the LegCo, five of which are functional constituencies and would be voted by elected district councilors. Those who are not elected will not be permitted to vote. This allows the people to indirectly participate in the election.

The vice president of China, Xi Jinping had approved the amended proposal in order to prevent Hong Kong’s political situation from worsening. The Executive Council also approved the proposal, and the Chief Executive of Hong Kong, Donald Tsang said there is a ‘ray of hope’ for the democratic development of Hong Kong as a result. The decision broke the stalemate between the government and the Democratic Party. According to Ming Pao, the decision also improved the chances of Xi Jinping’s becoming the next president.

The proposal is also popular among the Pro-Beijing political parties, such as the DAB, Federation of Trade Unions, and Liberal Party. Politicians Elsie Leung, Rita Fan and Tsang Hin-chi also support the proposal, the former stating that the proposal was ‘worthy of consideration’.

However, the proposal received heavy criticism among radical democrats, including the League of Social Democrats (LSD) and the Civic Party, as well as the general public. The LSD met outside the Causeway Bay branch of the Professional Teachers’ Union, where the Democratic Party’s meeting was held, to protest. They stepped onto a roasted pigeon, symbolising the Democratic Party as the Party’s logo included a dove. They waved placards with the names of seven of the party’s lawmakers and condemned them for being “democracy sinners.” The Party had also protested when Ho participated in the City Forum and during a meeting of the Alliance for Universal Suffrage.

During the City Forum, where Ho, Audrey Eu of the Civic Party and a National People’s Congress representative talked, LSD members frequently booed and attacked Ho. Even after Franklin Wong rescued Ho and put him in his car, some ‘Brothers of Victoria Park’ still surrounded the car, and police officers had to protect Ho so that he could leave. During the above mentioned meeting, many people claiming to be previous supporters of the Democratic Party accused the Party of betraying them, including a 80-year-old man called Chan, a 31-year-old named Cheung and an unnamed middle-aged woman.

These actions were condemned by Democratic Party members, including Szeto Wah, Emily Lau, and Cheung Man-kwong. Ho said that, ‘when extreme leftists and rightists attack you, you know that are in the right track’.

However, not all Democratic Party members supported the proposal. Martin Lee, the founder of the Democratic Party, had earlier vowed to leave the party should the package be backed. He stated that he was bitterly disappointed, and needed two weeks’ time to consider whether he should quit or not. Party member Andrew Cheng also opposed the proposal, as did James To. The former is thinking of leaving the party.

Ho says he will try to persuade the two to support the package in private. It has been predicted that once Lee and Cheng leave the party, around 20 members will follow their lead, putting the unity of the party at stake and leaving the party to face its greatest danger since 2000.



Sources

Bookmark-new.svg